Difference between revisions of "Talk:FOEPATCHISM"
LarrySwinger (talk | contribs) (We should find a shorter, more catch abbreviation that uses only the essential words.) |
LarrySwinger (talk | contribs) m (→Use a shorter term: Add signature, which I forgot.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Also, think about which of the terms are essential. I like Fair, Open, Ethical, and Inclusive but you can't make good words with only those letters. Possibly we can use FINE where we drop 'open' and think of a new word for N. This is short enough for the ability to catch on, and it's a good word with a positive vibe. It doesn't feel forced at all. Usage example: "our management should be FINE." | Also, think about which of the terms are essential. I like Fair, Open, Ethical, and Inclusive but you can't make good words with only those letters. Possibly we can use FINE where we drop 'open' and think of a new word for N. This is short enough for the ability to catch on, and it's a good word with a positive vibe. It doesn't feel forced at all. Usage example: "our management should be FINE." | ||
| − | By the way, I like using Inclusive in this context because it's reclaiming a word that's been appropriated by the woke. For another example of reclamation see how MetaGer brands itself as diverse, which I've covered [https://saidit.net/s/whatever/comments/c2fx/this_is_how_its_done_we_should_appropriate/ here]. | + | By the way, I like using Inclusive in this context because it's reclaiming a word that's been appropriated by the woke. For another example of reclamation see how MetaGer brands itself as diverse, which I've covered [https://saidit.net/s/whatever/comments/c2fx/this_is_how_its_done_we_should_appropriate/ here]. [[User:LarrySwinger|LarrySwinger]] ([[User talk:LarrySwinger|talk]]) 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | : MOIST is funny. | ||
| + | : But Foe Patch is an ideology too - thus "Ism" is apt for fixing enemy tyranny. | ||
| + | : The whole thing is a slippery slope - How do you define "fair" or any other term? | ||
| + | : The repetition of ideas helps I think to push what is obviously opposite to various top-down forms of control. | ||
| + | : Moist and fine are already words. Foepatchism is a '''new''' word and a portmanteau that makes sense. From your fine post, "The core of this trick is to put two words together." | ||
| + | :: ~ [[User:JasonCarswell|JasonCarswell]] ([[User talk:JasonCarswell|talk]]) 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:23, 25 July 2024
Use a shorter term
FOEPATCHISM is a mouthful and sounds alien, and when the abbreviation is explained it's just too long. I suggest a shorter, single word is used. You don't need to get all the terms.
I suggest MOIST for Management that's Open, Inclusive, Social, and Transparent. An alternative would be IMPACT, although that isn't as funny a term. And we need to think about how the term is used in a sentence. "We need more MOIST," for example. In the case of IMPACT it would be "we should have IMPACT".
Also, think about which of the terms are essential. I like Fair, Open, Ethical, and Inclusive but you can't make good words with only those letters. Possibly we can use FINE where we drop 'open' and think of a new word for N. This is short enough for the ability to catch on, and it's a good word with a positive vibe. It doesn't feel forced at all. Usage example: "our management should be FINE."
By the way, I like using Inclusive in this context because it's reclaiming a word that's been appropriated by the woke. For another example of reclamation see how MetaGer brands itself as diverse, which I've covered here. LarrySwinger (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- MOIST is funny.
- But Foe Patch is an ideology too - thus "Ism" is apt for fixing enemy tyranny.
- The whole thing is a slippery slope - How do you define "fair" or any other term?
- The repetition of ideas helps I think to push what is obviously opposite to various top-down forms of control.
- Moist and fine are already words. Foepatchism is a new word and a portmanteau that makes sense. From your fine post, "The core of this trick is to put two words together."
- ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)