Political Saviours Are Not A Thing

From Projex.Wiki
Revision as of 13:43, 3 February 2025 by JasonCarswell (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
To Do
Paperwork Life Preserver Ring Assistance.jpg

To do on this wiki-page:

The ultimate truth:
All governments are inherently evil mafias (kakistocracies), corrupted, secretive, manipulative, divisive, exploitative, abusive, violent, and excessively murderous, with (s)elected puppet "leaders" rigging all entwined systems to serve psychotic Machiavellian elites for full spectrum dominance waged upon their own citizens with their bankster-media-military-industrial-academic-corporatocracy.
Voluntaryism
The common sense idea that all forms of human association should be voluntary... with the assertion that any act of violence [or coercion] other than self defense, whether by an individual or organization, is illegitimate and unlawful.
(Brave Search: Voluntaryism)
Category: Anarchism + Voluntaryism
Listicle started by Jason Carswell on January 22, 2025. Last update January 22, 2025.


"Political Saviours Are Not A Thing" could have also easily been titled, "Billionaires are not your cool friends".

It's all political theatre to keep the masses distracted in service of the corrupt matrix of rigged systems controlled by the evil ruling class. They will say the things we want to hear but their actions will be opposite. They claim to be ignorant and inept despite their endless resources of massive think tanks, secret agencies, unethical militaries, corrupt justice systems, exploitative corporations, and vile banksters. Reject the ruling class's Hanlon's Razor excuse. Only mafia governments reward for "gross ineptitude" and mass murder.

If you still have faith that Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Carney, and/or Pierre Poilievre intend to help humanity after reading, listening, or viewing the carefully curated content presented here, then as a willingly ignorant fool (brainwashed by the corporate media and/or infiltrated alternate media rotten with controlled-ops) you are a helpless waste of time and energy unless you learn to come around. Start by understanding the terminology.

Trusting a fun surface-dwelling questioner like news-reader Jimmy Dore can only take you so far. Deeper dives and better guides are necessary for greater contextual understanding. The recommended websites listicle includes some.

This article initially started by highlighting critically important sections within long-form Whitney Webb interviews. Read, listen, or view the great noted selections, and/or if able, be rewarded with many more powerful insights in her entire interviews.

To research specific people, institutions, or topical content, most if not all YouTube videos will provide auto-generated transcripts (found in the show notes), and you can CTRL-F to find key words (ie. Trump, Carney, Musk, etc.) or scroll through the entire A.I.-generated poorly formatted text.


Whitney Web on the technocracy

  • I use some of these sites too because there really is unfortunately not many other options for people in independent media that take an adversarial approach to power to get their point of view out. While that is still able to happen, I'm not going to judge people for using it. But I do think if you are critical of the increasing power that Silicon Valley has over our lives there are ways to reduce your dependence on it. Because maybe there aren't - especially if you're in independent media - useful social media alternatives that will really get your opinion out there. You don't need to use Gmail, or Google Business Suite, or Microsoft Word - [because] there are alternatives to all of those. There are alternatives to Windows and Apple operating systems, if you so choose. A lot has happened and over the past several years [so] they're not as difficult to use as before. If we allow our lives to be completely dependent on these platforms, that gives these oligarchs an unprecedented amount of power and influence over [us].
I think we should be wary of how much power we're giving to them. Everyone is going to have different red lines about what that is - and I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, because I'm not really in the business of that - but if you were concerned about these things, I think you should try and reduce your dependence on Big Tech as much as you possibly can. That does not mean go and buy Eric Prince's unplugged phone that's made by Israeli intelligence veterans - which some people claim as a solution to that, including Tulsey Gabbard for example. There are other alternatives that are open source and not linked to people that ran CIA death squads in the Middle East, like Eric Prince and that don't have ties to foreign intelligence agencies. You can use some sort of alternative to reduce their power over you.
I think while we have voices on these platforms it is important to criticize Silicon Valley billionaires, whether they're posturing to be on the left, like Reed Hoffman, or posturing to be on the right, like Elon Musk and Peter Teal. I think we should be critical of the fusion of Silicon Valley with the National Security State and a lot of these other trends that are developing. Or the fusion of Big Pharma with a lot of Silicon Valley firms that are being incubated in part by this ARPA-H agency (that we mentioned earlier). There should be scrutiny of how much power these people are accumulating, and are we really going back to an era like Industrial Age Barons that have extreme control over our lives and workers lives - to the point [of] devastating consequences? If anyone's familiar with the Rockefeller Legacy in the late 1800s and early 1900s, for example. Do we really want to go back to that neo-feudal era in society? If we don't, we should really look at ways to end our dependence on them and resist this pull that celebrities, and people like Elon Musk. Some of these other figures have tried to cultivate through their patronage of media in recent years.
As far as the two-party paradigm goes, if you're voting for a Democrat or Republican the tactic is to keep you in the [Establishment] box, even if you hate the candidate they force on you, is the same - it's to be scared of the other guy. We saw that with Biden in 2020, "Vote for Biden or Trump will win again." And this time it was, "Biden and Kamala are so terrible," and, "This will be the end of the country as we know it if we don't vote Trump." It's the same tactic [of both parties] to keep you in the box - choosing a candidate that has already shown to you what they are, and what they will do, when they are in power. We can't keep doing that and expect different results at the end of the day.
I really reject the idea that our only hope as a society is to vote for a lying politician that's a Democrat or a Republican every four years. That is not the only way to fix the country. We're told that it is and that if you don't vote for one guy you must support the other guy. This is a paradigm we absolutely have to blow up. It makes no sense and these people do not represent us. They show us time and again. There has to be some sort of movement. The reason that Bernie Sanders was popular is because people want some sort of government populist changes. That's a big reason for Trump's popularity as well - but it's all rhetoric with Trump - it is apparently with a lot of these people, unfortunately.
Obviously Americans want some sort of populist change. They don't want the foreign wars. We have to find a way to do that - and the way to do that is not to focus on political rhetoric - it's to focus on the actual policy and fight for the actual policy or fight against policies we don't want. So I would argue we should stop focusing on the politician, on the rhetoric, and focus on the policy.
If we want to end what's going on in Gaza, we focus on that, and not what people are saying about it. People like Kamala talking out of both sides of their mouths depending on what demographic they're trying to cater to, it should instead be focused on how do we affect real change there. Maybe people should look again at the BDS movement that people on the "free-speech" Republican Party have tried to legislate out of existence and completely censor. His head of DHS, Kristi Noem, before she was appointed she tried to essentially legislate equating criticism of the State of Israel, a civil government, with anti-Semitism - which is absolutely not what it is at all. These things I think we should be concerned about, whether it's being pushed by either side. And again, as I said earlier, the same policies are pushed, the sales pitch are different, and it's very important, in that case, we stop focusing on the sales pitches and focus on the policies so we can get the policies that represent us and that we want.
~ Whitney Webb, UnlimitedHangout.com
55:23 - 1:01:39, with minor conversational hesitations edited out from
Epstein, Sexual Blackmail, and Israel's Grip on American Politics (w/ Whitney Webb) (1:33:38) ~ Bad Faith, 2024-11-21


Bill Gates

More soon.


Donald Trump

It's not difficult to be better than the pathetic corrupt evil Joe Biden, but the lesser of two evils is painfully still very evil.

We shall see if he bothers to keep his promises, or, as per usual with second-term presidents, if he gets much worse with no more elections to campaign for and no one left to please but his ruling class friends.


Elon Musk

continued...


George Soros

More soon.


Joe Biden


Justin Trudeau

More soon.


Mark Carney

The following transcript from 14:48 to 30:18 covers the Financial Coup, Mark Carney, and How COVID unemployed half a billion people.
Going Direct Reset
" So in August 22nd 2019k, the G7 Central Bankers who meet every year in Jackson Hill, Wyoming voted on a plan called the going direct reset and that plan was designed by a group of retired Central Bankers who had literally parked and worked through the Black Rock investment Institute which is sort of an arm that black rock does to engage in policy discussion and um and that plan was voted on by the central Bankers who proceeded after the you know everybody goes back to the office and sure enough in September the FED rolls into the repo market and starts engaging in what is extraordinary intervention in the markets including doing something that has never happened before which is directly injecting money into the economy not just into the reserve normally they inject money into the Reserve System and then the Reserve System will or will not inject money into the economy this time they injected direct um what was interesting is that black rock at the time published some of the material describing the plan and if you look at what they are doing which I would describe as sort of a consolidation of what I have called the Financial Coup the actions taken through the health care legal and Regulatory system that started March 2020 were simply part of the going direct reset and what you watched was um an injection of significant money into uh I would describe I would oversimplify as Wall Street at the same time the health care rules shut down the main Street economy and so you have a shutdown the little guys are basically shut down by disaster capitalism working through the Health Care System whereas the big money Players Get massive amounts of money to go out and engage in global sweep stake which is buy everything cheap one of the reasons they can do this is um black rock is an asset manager who manages it's one of the largest holders of index funds and retirement savings and so a lot of the money they're swinging around um are individual money or working through Pension funds but that have major positions in every company in America so if you look at the Pharmaceuticals if you look at all the companies all the tech companies you know Black Rock again and again and again has a big position big position so while they're managing all these companies then the FED does something absolutely unprecedented in my world as a financial person I cannot tell you how shocking it was they basically turned over operational Asset Management functions for the fed and the New York fed to Black Rock they just simply delegated this is this is the equivalent of um imagine if the Department of Justice called you up and said Whitney we want you to start a company and we're going to turn over different aspects of enforcement for the United States to your company I mean it was an extraordinary and very shocking thing in the meantime Larry fin who's the he's the head of black rock is basically running around the the financial World um pontificating about social responsibility so here we have we here we have black rock in the room to engineer the greatest example of disaster capitalism and economic Warfare ever engineered in the history of the world that literally at first blush put 500 million people out of work while he's pontificating to people about social responsibility was quite extraordinary and you wonder you know you you know hubris is one thing this was so over the top it was you know George or Orwell would have just even it would even shocked Orwell it was quite extraordinary I think Think's purpose there well let's keep in mind too that he's on the Board of Trustees of the world economic Forum so they're very involved with their stakeholder capitalism uh evangelism efforts um I guess you could say so him going around talking about social responsibility and we need to be more inclusive and all of this uses essentially the same uh buzzwords that the world economic Forum uses or uh groups like the council for inclusive capitalism that and of course that Council which is headed by the pope supposedly includes several other uh members of The W uh Board of Trustees like uh Mark Carney uh the central former uh Bank of England Governor um also Marc Benioff who's on the we as well and is the found founder of Salesforce and the head of their fourth Industrial Revolution committee this let me just give you an example of social responsibility when
Social Responsibility
" the central Bankers so JP palal Mark Carney at that time was in the room for the bank of England when they walked in that room and voted to do going direct they literally knew they were going to put 500 million people out of work okay and so that is the equivalent of dropping several nuclear bombs on major cities around the world you just do it you know it's a financial nuclear bomb instead of a physical nuclear bomb but it's going to kill hundreds of thousands if not millions of people and you know that voting on it so when Mark Carney talks about social responsibility he's talking about social responsibility having intentionally and knowingly made a decision you know there's a German expression for it it's called Death killer you know has made a decision essentially to drop the equivalent of a nuclear bomb and so the the the comparison between what they're doing and what they're saying is quite extraordinary and communicates a level of disrespect for the average person that says what it says yeah I think that's pretty significant but I think that's also common in this whole mindset that they they view themselves as sort of stewards for the future of human society and and the human race but uh have complete contempt for everyone on the uh that's not in the elite circles in which they operate essentially and think they know what's you know it's the it's the whole Tech technocrat mindset right well Mark Carney Mark Carney just published a book called values which I'm reading and and that must be fun I'm looking I'm looking forward to aligning his values with what he's done so far yeah well that will be telling but I think one thing um that I learned recently about Mark Carney that fits sort of into the context of of some of the these things we've been talking about is that in 2019 he gave a speech it's about how a new economic system uh was going to be needed in order to move uh the U the world uh to a net zero economies basically change remake the economy under the guise of climate change that a whole new economic system was going to be ushered in so it's interesting then to see people connected to him through the We Like Larry fank for example sort of orchestrating this what you described as like this nuclear bomb in terms of the the fiscal response to to covid-19 essentially uh weakening even further an already weakened uh financial and economic system in the United States uh perhaps with the purpose of putting something new in its place well remember
Financial Coup
" they have two issues they have if you look at what I call the financial coup they have levered up the national governments and then shifted the money out of those government governments are out of those Pension funds so think of this as a bank robbery and before everybody you know sort of realizes the money's gone and they want the money back they need essentially aruse to reconsolidate the system and one of the things they need is total Financial control and that requires an electrical grid if they're going to do CBDCs and have the kind of tech and data intensive grid that you're talking about with your last two articles they need everybody on electrical system if I have you an electric car and you are doing all your transactions digitally then I can control where you can travel to and I can turn off your money anywhere anytime any place right yeah that's that's the goal of I think central bank digital currencies is to do that and they've been quite explicit about total control being uh the goal of that about as explicit as you can be um but it's becoming more apparent to me and and that's why I found this carne speech so revealing from 2019 is that over the course of this year uh we've seen sort of the climate change uh issue pop up again and we had um right CLA Schwab uh in the beginning of January essentially announced before uh the virtual Davos Conference of this year that uh the fear and concern over covid-19 by the end of 2021 was going to give way to climate change that there would be that same sort of fear that enveloped the world in in during most of of 2020 uh but with climate change and obviously that fear and that crisis however it manifests and that these people apparently have advanced knowledge of uh will be used for some purpose and it seems to be uh a creation of a new Financial system because not long after CLA Schwab said that uh Larry thinkink of Black Rock uh gave a a very uh interesting made some interesting statements um in his annual letter that came out not that long afterwards um and it's quoted in the New York Times well the New York Times describes uh what Larry think was doing as uh it says uh think is pushing out the the goalpost on climate action asking companies to quote disclose a plan for how their business model will be compatible with a net zero economy um with nearly n trillion dollar of Investments Black Rock has a lot of influence last year the firm voted against 69 companies and against 64 directors for climate related reasons and it put 191 companies on watch so he's definitely uh moved that way and we've seen since then uh uh Goldman Sachs JP Morgan Vanguard and a lot of other Titans of Finance uh sort of pivot their focus on ESGs these environmental social governance um you know rules for corporations and because of uh black Rock's influence and and stakes and so many corporations it seems like they are basically planning to do sort of a corporate coup uh under the guise of Cl climate change and Institute a lot of these uh moves that are going to take us towards stakeholder uh capitalism as the we so so what they're
Climate Change
" trying to do is is use social responsibility to assert Capital control centrally because if you look at how these things are going to be applied it's going to be very arbitrary so you know think of the official story and then there's the real story and the real story is Central Capital controls and back to the financial control the the thing to understand and I have yet to see how they're going to roll this out you want climate change because Co exhaustion is upon us so you need a new ruse that's part of it but the other part of it is the climate change regulations they proposed in the past and I think they're going to try again are very effective at moving people off the land and grabbing assets so if if you want to back door seize a huge amount of assets and get control of the land climate change is a is a very effective way so it gets you your smart grid but it also gets you major access at low price to a lot of land in real estate right I think I think that's fair too and I think they definitely want to do that because they want to her people towards the smart cities and all that stuff as they get that uh set up and prevent sort of uh prevent really any sort of existence and and rural areas and that climate change will be um the um the justification for that but I also think you know um in you know if this does come to pass in the US obviously it's going to put a lot of energy behind the so-called uh Green New Deal and things like this and if you read it um or at least the the version as it was going around when I wrote on it um back in 2018 uh when uh okazi Cortez was first promoting it uh you know they they like to talk about it in very flowery language but if you actually read it um it's essentially um a promotion of cap and trade and would be fun fed by the fed and all of this stuff really as far away as you can get from any sort of progressive uh policy and um sorry you want to comment well here's what's
The Green Deal
" happening and the new green deal is definitely part of it you know we've had a balance of power between the electorate voting for the people who control the budget and fiscal policy and the bankers controlling monetary policy through the Central Bank what this is and what black rock is at the heart of doing is engineering a takeover a complete takeover of the treasury function by the central banks in other words you know the the basically electric electric is electorate is getting pushed out and that's why the issue is going to come down to taxation without representation and and one of the reasons it's so important to have a ruse of some kind like climate change is um as people get concerned about why should we pay taxes for something that's destroying us destroying our businesses you know they need an excuse oh it's an emergency it's a climate emergency which of course my favorite part of the Biden Administration was was uh appointing a climate are who flies around in his own private plane I mean all of these people more often than not tend to fly around in their private planes you know like Bill Gates uh with you know when uh CLA Schwab announced this imminent pivot to climate change uh did that pivot and is now talking about climate change and doing book tours and all of this before the EP stuff flared its uh its head again and he was doing that in private jets and that's you know it it's another example of what we saw with you know covid-19 that there's rules for the little people but not for the elite and they claim that we're all in this together and that's the selling point of climate change as well but it's going to be rules that the elite don't have to follow um or even certain institutions that they need to enforce uh this system they want to create like the military for example so like the US military uh very uh one of the most polluting organizations on Earth um if you want to talk about you know the official climate change narrative you should be outraged they're not included in the green new deal at all because they're gous consumer of fossil fuels and there's no mention of that at all but they need the military uh to enforce uh this this system whether domestically uh because Biden uh back in 1995 tried to get posy katus removed some people forget about that it's very likely he'll do it again under the guise of domestic terrorism or whatever um so you know it it really um it's going to be you know rules for thee but not for me all over again my one of my favorite descriptions was I had a scientist want to entertain me for a
The Council on Inclusive Capitalism
" lunch comparing the carbon use of f30 Lo F35 Tock cows it was pretty funny so obviously these guys you know this is really about grabbing resources and resource control centrally and and this is part of building the smart there was one thing I wanted to mention to you did you ever go look at the website for inclusive capitalism uh the Council on inclusive capitalism yes yeah yeah and the people that are there uh Microsoft sorry MasterCard visa and ernston Young and the rocket Foundation

Pierre Poilievre

More soon.


Ruling Class

More soon.


Zionism

More soon.
Retrieved from "https://projex.wiki/index.php?title=Political_Saviours_Are_Not_A_Thing&oldid=166610"