|
|
| Line 85: |
Line 85: |
| | | | |
| | {{More soon}} | | {{More soon}} |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Going Direct Reset ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''CAF''' (14:47-18:43) : So in August 22nd, 2019, the [[G7]] [[central bankers]] who meet every year in Jackson Hill, Wyoming voted on a plan called the [[Going Direct Reset]]. That plan was designed by a group of retired central bankers who had literally parked and worked through the [[Black Rock Investment Institute]] - which is sort of an arm that [[Black Rock]] does to engage in policy discussion. That plan was voted on by the central bankers [...] and sure enough in September the [[Fed]] rolls into the repo market and starts engaging in what is extraordinary intervention in the markets - including doing something that has never happened before, which is directly injecting money into the economy. Not just into the Reserve. Normally they inject money into the [Federal] Reserve System and then the Reserve System will or will not inject money into the economy. This time they injected direct. What was interesting is that Black Rock at the time published some of the material describing the plan - and if you look at what they are doing, which I would describe as sort of a consolidation of what I have called the <big>'''[[Financial Coup]]'''</big>, the actions taken through the [[health care]], [[legal]], and [[regulatory system]] that started in [[March 2020]] were simply part of the <big>'''[[Going Direct Reset ]]'''</big>. What you watched was an injection of significant money into, I would oversimplify as, [[Wall Street]]. At the same time the [[health care]] rules shut down the [[Main Street]] economy. And so you have a shutdown. The little guys are basically shut down by [[disaster capitalism]] working through the [[health care system]] whereas the [[big money]] players get massive amounts of money to go out and engage in global sweep stake - which is buy everything cheap. One of the reasons they can do this is [[Black Rock]] is an asset manager. It's one of the largest holders of [[index funds]] and [[retirement savings]], so a lot of the money they're swinging around are individual money or working through [[pension funds]] that have major positions in every company in America. If you look at the [[pharmaceuticals]], [...] all the companies, all the [[tech companies]] - [[Black Rock]] again and again and again has a big position, big position. So while they're managing all these companies, the [[Fed]] does something absolutely unprecedented. In my world as a financial person, I cannot tell you how shocking it was. They basically turned over [[operational asset management functions]] for the Fed and the New York Fed to Black Rock. They just simply delegated. Imagine if the [[Department of Justice]] called you up and said, "Whitney, we want you to start a company and we're going to turn over different aspects of enforcement for the United States to your company." I mean it was an extraordinary and very shocking thing. In the meantime, [[Larry Fink]], the head of Black Rock, is basically running around the financial world pontificating about "[[social responsibility]]." <big>'''Here we have [[Black Rock]] in the room to engineer the greatest example of [[disaster capitalism]] and [[economic warfare]] ever engineered in the [[history of the world]] that literally at first blush put [[500 million people out of work]] while he's pontificating to people about [[social responsibility]].'''</big> It was quite extraordinary. Hubris is one thing, this was so over the top, it would [have] even shocked [George] Orwell. It was quite extraordinary.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''WW''' (18:43-19:32) : I think [[Larry Fink |[Larry] Fink]]'s purpose there... Let's keep in mind too that he's on the [[Board of Trustees]] of the [[World Economic Forum]], so they're very involved with their [[stakeholder capitalism]] evangelism efforts, I guess you could say. So him going around talking - about "social responsibility" and "we need to be more inclusive" and all of this - uses essentially the same buzzwords that the World Economic Forum uses, or groups like the [[Council for Inclusive Capitalism]]. Of course that council, which is headed by the [[Pope]] supposedly, includes several other members of the [[WEF]] Board of Trustees, like [[Mark Carney]], the former [[Central Bank of England]] governor, also [[Marc Benioff]] who's on the WEF as well, and is the founder of [[Salesforce]] and the head of their [[Fourth Industrial Revolution Committee]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Social Responsibility ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''CAF''' (19:34-20:44) : Let me just give you an example of "[[social responsibility]]." When the central bankers - so [[Jay Powell]], [[Mark Carney]] at that time was in the room for the [[Bank of England]] - when they walked in that room and voted to do Going Direct [Reset], they literally knew they were going to put [[500 million people out of work]]. That is the equivalent of dropping several nuclear bombs on major cities around the world. It's a [[financial nuclear bomb]] instead of a physical nuclear bomb but it's going to kill hundreds of thousands if not millions of people - and you know that voting on it. So when [[Mark Carney]] talks about "social responsibility," he's talking about social responsibility having intentionally and knowingly made a decision - there's a German expression for it, called "death killer" - has made a decision essentially to drop the equivalent of a nuclear bomb. The comparison between what they're doing and what they're saying is quite extraordinary and communicates a level of disrespect for the average person. That says what it says.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''WW''' (20:45-21:07) : Yeah. I think that's pretty significant but I think that's also common in this whole mindset that they view themselves as sort of stewards for the future of human society and the human race but have complete contempt for everyone that's not in the elite circles in which they operate essentially. It's the whole [[technocrat]] mindset.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''CAF''' (21:06-21:21) : Right. [[Mark Carney]] just published a book called "''[[Values]]''," which I'm reading and I'm looking forward to aligning his "values" with what he's done so far.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''WW''' (21:22-22:17) : That will be telling. One thing that I learned recently about [[Mark Carney]] that fits into the context of these things we've been talking about is that in 2019 he gave a speech about how a new economic system was going to be needed in order to move the world to a [[net zero economy]]. Basically remake the economy under the guise of [[climate change]], that a whole new economic system was going to be ushered in. So it's interesting then to see people connected to him through the WEF, like [[Larry Fink]] for example, orchestrating this, what you described as this nuclear bomb, in terms of the the fiscal response to to [[COVID-19]] essentially weakening even further an already weakened financial and economic system in the United States, perhaps with the purpose of putting something new in its place.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Financial Coup ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''CAF''' (22:18-23:12) : Remember they have two issues. If you look at what I call the [[Financial Coup]], they have levered up the national governments and then shifted the money out of those governments or out of those [[pension funds]]. So think of this as a bank robbery and before everybody realizes the money's gone and they want the money back, they need essentially a ruse to reconsolidate the system. One of the things they need is [[total financial control]] and that requires an [[electrical grid]]. If they're going to do [[CBDC]]s and have the kind of tech and [[data intensive grid]] that you're talking about with your last two articles, they need everybody on electrical system. If I have you in an electric car and you are doing all your transactions digitally, then I can control where you can travel to, and I can turn off your money any where, any time, any place.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''WW''' (23:15-25:36) : That's the goal of central bank digital currencies, is to do that. They've been quite explicit about total control being the goal. About as explicit as you can be. It's becoming more apparent to me, and that's why I found this [Mark] Carney speech so revealing from 2019. Over the course of this year we've seen the [[climate change]] issue pop up again. We had [[Klaus Schwab]] in the beginning of January essentially announced before the virtual [[Davos Conference]] of this year{{citation needed}} that the fear and concern over COVID-19 by the end of 2021 was going to give way to Climate Change. There would be that same sort of fear that enveloped the world during most of of 2020, but with Climate Change. Obviously that fear and that crisis, however it manifests, and that these people apparently have advanced knowledge of, will be used for some purpose and it seems to be a creation of a new [[financial system]]. Because not long after [[Klaus Schwab]] said that, [[Larry Fink]] of [[Black Rock]] made some interesting statements. In his annual letter that came out not that long afterwards, the [[New York Times]] describes, [[Larry Fink]] is pushing out the the goalpost on [[climate action]] asking companies to "''disclose a plan for how their business model will be compatible with a [[net zero economy]]. With nearly a [[trillion dollars of investments]] [[Black Rock]] has a lot of influence. Last year the firm voted against 69 companies and against 64 directors for climate related reasons and it put 191 companies on watch.''" So he's definitely moved that way, and we've seen since then [[Goldman Sachs]], [[JP Morgan]], [[Vanguard]], and a lot of other titans of finance pivot their focus on [[ESG]]s, these [[environmental social governance]] rules for corporations, and because of [[Black Rock]]'s influence, stakes, and so many corporations, it seems like they are basically planning to do sort of a [[corporate coup]] under the guise of [[Climate Change]] and institute a lot of these moves that are going to take us towards [[stakeholder capitalism]] as the WEF likes to call it.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Climate Change ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''CAF''' (25:36-26:39) : What they're trying to do is is use [[social responsibility]] to assert [[capital control centrally]]. If you look at how these things are going to be applied it's going to be very arbitrary. Think of the official story and then there's the real story, and the real story is [[central capital controls]] and back to the financial control. The thing to understand - and I have yet to see how they're going to roll this out - you want [[Climate Change]] because COVID-19 exhaustion is upon us, so you need a new ruse that's part of it, but the other part of it is the Climate Change regulations they proposed in the past - and I think they're going to try again - are very effective at moving people off the land and grabbing assets. If you want to back door seize a huge amount of assets and get control of the land, [[Climate Change]] is a very effective way. It gets you your [[smart grid]] but it also gets you major access at low price to a lot of land in real estate.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''WW''' (26:39-27:35) : Right. I think that's fair too, and I think they definitely want to do that because they want to herd people towards the [[smart cities]] and all that stuff as they get that set up and prevent any sort of existence in rural areas and that [[Climate Change]] will be the justification for that. I also think if this does come to pass, in the US obviously, it's going to put a lot of energy behind the so-called [[Green New Deal]] and things like this. If you read it, or at least the the version as it was going around when I wrote on it back in 2018, when [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez |[Alexandria] Ocasio-Cortez]] was first promoting it, they like to talk about it in very flowery language but if you actually read it, it's essentially a promotion of [[cap and trade]] and would be funded by the [[Fed]]. All of this stuff really is as far away as you can get from any sort of [[progressive policy]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === The Green New Deal ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''CAF''' (27:38-28:39) : Here's what's happening, and the [[New Green Deal]] is definitely part of it. We've had a balance of power between the [[electorate]] voting for the people who control the budget and fiscal policy, and the [[bankers]] controlling monetary policy through the [[central bank]]. What this is - and what [[Black Rock]] is at the heart of doing - is <big>'''engineering a takeover'''</big>, a complete takeover of the treasury function by the central banks. In other words, basically the electorate is getting pushed out - and that's why the issue is going to come down to [[taxation without representation]]. One of the reasons it's so important to have a ruse of some kind, like [[Climate Change]] is, as people get concerned about, "Why should we pay taxes for something that's destroying us, destroying our businesses?" They need an excuse, "Oh! It's an emergency - it's a Climate Emergency!" My favorite part of the [[Joe Biden Administration |[Joe] Biden Administration]] was appointing a [[Climate Czar]] who flies around in his own private plane.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''WW''' (28:41-30:05) : All of these people, more often than not, tend to fly around in their private planes. Like [[Bill Gates]] with [[Klaus Schwab]] announced this imminent pivot to [[Climate Change]], did that pivot, and is now talking about [[Climate Change], and doing book tours, and all of this - before the [[Jeffrey Epstein |[Jeffrey] Epstein]] stuff flared its head again. He was doing that in private jets. It's another example of what we saw with [[COVID-19]] - that there's rules for the little people but not for the elite - and they claim that we're all in this together, and that's the selling point of climate change as well. But it's going to be rules that the elite don't have to follow - or even certain institutions that they need to enforce this system they want to create. Like the military for example, the [[US military]], one of the most polluting organizations on Earth. If you want to talk about the [[official Climate Change narrative]], you should be outraged they're not included in the [[Green New Deal]] at all - because they're the largest consumer of [[fossil fuels]], and there's no mention of that at all. They need the military to enforce this system, because [[Joe Biden |[Joe] Biden]] back in 1995 tried to get [[Posse Comitatus Act |Posse Comitatus [Act]]] removed. Some people forget about that. It's very likely he'll do it again under the guise of [[domestic terrorism]], or whatever. It's going to be, "<big>'''[[Rules for thee, but not for me]]'''</big>," all over again.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === The Council on Inclusive Capitalism ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''CAF''' (30:05-30:33) : One of my favorite descriptions was - I had a scientist wanted to entertain me for a lunch, comparing the carbon use of [[Lockheed F-35] to cows [farts]. It was pretty funny. This is really about grabbing resources and resource control centrally - and this is part of building the smart grid. Did you ever go look at the website for [[Inclusive Capitalism]]?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : '''WW''' (30:34-30:46) : [[The Council on Inclusive Capitalism]], yeah, and the people that are there - [[MasterCard]], [[Visa]], [[Ernst & Young]], and the [[Rockefeller Foundation]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :: ~ Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report) and Whitney Webb (Unlimited Hangout)
| |
| − | ::: 14:48 - 30:46, with minor conversational hesitations edited out, covering the [[Financial Coup]], [[Mark Carney]], [[How COVID unemployed half a billion people]], and the [[Climate Change Scam]]
| |
| − | ::: '''''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCoxTGtA_JM Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report) And Whitney Webb | Globally Intertwined Criminally Designed Control System]''''' (1:09:37) ~ Underground Revolutionary, 2024-12-19 (It's quite evident this is a re-upload of an older interview.)
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Line 140: |
Line 95: |
| | | | |
| | {{More soon}} | | {{More soon}} |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Whitney Webb on the technocracy ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * I use some of these sites too because there really is unfortunately not many other options for people in [[independent media]] that take an adversarial approach to power to get their point of view out. While that is still able to happen, I'm not going to judge people for using it. But I do think if you are critical of the increasing power that [[Silicon Valley]] has over our lives there are ways to reduce your dependence on it. Because maybe there aren't - especially if you're in independent media - useful social media alternatives that will really get your opinion out there. You don't need to use [[Gmail]], or [[Google Business Suite]], or [[Microsoft Word]] - [because] there are alternatives to all of those. There are alternatives to [[Windows]] and [[Apple]] [[operating systems]], if you so choose. A lot has happened and over the past several years [so] they're not as difficult to use as before. <big>'''If we allow our lives to be completely dependent on these platforms, that gives these [[oligarchs]] an unprecedented amount of power and influence over [us].'''</big>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : I think we should be wary of how much power we're giving to them. Everyone is going to have different [[red lines]] about what that is - and I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, because I'm not really in the business of that - but if you were concerned about these things, I think you should try and reduce your dependence on [[Big Tech]] as much as you possibly can. That does not mean go and buy [[Eric Prince]]'s unplugged phone that's made by [[Israeli intelligence]] veterans - which some people claim as a solution to that, including [[Tulsey Gabbard]] for example. There are other alternatives that are [[open source]] and not linked to people that ran [[CIA death squads]] in the [[Middle East]], like [[Eric Prince]] and that don't have ties to [[foreign intelligence agencies]]. <big>'''You can use some sort of alternative to reduce their power over you.'''</big>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : I think while we have voices on these platforms it is important to criticize [[Silicon Valley]] [[billionaires]], whether they're posturing to be on the left, like [[Reed Hoffman]], or posturing to be on the right, like [[Elon Musk]] and [[Peter Teal]]. I think we should be critical of the fusion of [[Silicon Valley]] with the [[National Security State]] and a lot of these other trends that are developing. Or the fusion of [[Big Pharma]] with a lot of [[Silicon Valley]] firms that are being incubated in part by this ARPA-H agency (that we mentioned earlier). <big>'''There should be scrutiny of how much power these people are accumulating'''</big>, and are we really going back to an era like [[Industrial Age Barons]] that have extreme control over our lives and workers lives - to the point [of] devastating consequences? If anyone's familiar with the [[Rockefeller Legacy]] in the late 1800s and early 1900s, for example. Do we really want to go back to that [[neo-feudal]] era in society? If we don't, we should really look at ways to end our dependence on them and resist this pull that celebrities, and people like [[Elon Musk]]. Some of these other figures have tried to cultivate through their patronage of media in recent years.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : As far as the [[two-party paradigm]] goes, if you're voting for a [[Democrat]] or [[Republican]] the tactic is to keep you in the <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Establishment]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> box, even if you hate the candidate they force on you, is the same - it's to be scared of the other guy. We saw that with [[Biden]] in 2020, "Vote for Biden or [[Trump]] will win again." And this time it was, "Biden and [[Kamala]] are so terrible," and, "This will be the end of the country as we know it if we don't vote Trump." It's the same tactic [of both parties] to keep you in the box - choosing a candidate that has already shown to you what they are, and what they will do, when they are in power. We can't keep doing that and expect different results at the end of the day.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : I really reject the idea that our only hope as a society is to [[vote]] for a [[lying politician]] that's a [[Democrat]] or a [[Republican]] every four years. That is not the only way to fix the country. We're told that it is and that if you don't vote for one guy you must support the other guy. This is a paradigm we absolutely have to blow up. It makes no sense and these people do not represent us. They show us time and again. There has to be some sort of movement. The reason that [[Bernie Sanders]] was popular is because people want some sort of government populist changes. That's a big reason for [[Trump]]'s popularity as well - but it's all rhetoric with Trump - it is apparently with a lot of these people, unfortunately.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : <big>'''Obviously Americans want some sort of [[populist change]].'''</big> They don't want the [[foreign wars]]. We have to find a way to do that - and the way to do that is not to focus on [[political rhetoric]] - it's to <big>'''focus on the [[actual policy]] and fight for the actual policy or fight against policies we don't want'''</big>. So I would argue we should stop focusing on the politician, on the rhetoric, and focus on the policy.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : If we want to end what's going on in [[Gaza]], we focus on that, and not what people are saying about it. People like Kamala talking out of both sides of their mouths depending on what demographic they're trying to cater to, it should <big>'''instead be focused on how do we affect real change there'''</big>. Maybe people should look again at the [[BDS movement]] that people on the "free-speech" [[Republican Party]] have tried to [[legislate out of existence]] and completely [[censor]]. His head of [[DHS]], [[Kristi Noem]], before she was appointed she tried to essentially legislate equating criticism of the [[State of Israel]], a civil government, with [[anti-Semitism]] - which is absolutely not what it is at all. These things I think we should be concerned about, whether it's being pushed by either side. And again, as I said earlier, the same policies are pushed, the sales pitch are different, and it's very important, in that case, we <big>'''stop focusing on the sales pitches and focus on the policies'''</big> so we can get the policies that represent us and that we want.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :: ~ Whitney Webb, [https://UnlimitedHangout.com/ UnlimitedHangout.com]
| |
| − | ::: 55:23 - 1:01:39, with minor conversational hesitations edited out from
| |
| − | ::: '''''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbtFUumXuK4 Epstein, Sexual Blackmail, and Israel's Grip on American Politics (w/ Whitney Webb)]''''' (1:33:38) ~ Bad Faith, 2024-11-21
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| To Do
|
|
|
|
|
To do on this wiki-page:
|
Voluntaryism The common sense idea that all forms of human association should be voluntary... with the assertion that any act of violence [or coercion] other than self defense, whether by an individual or organization, is illegitimate and unlawful.
(Brave Search:
Voluntaryism)
Category: Anarchism + Voluntaryism - Listicle started by Jason Carswell on 2025-01-22. Last update 2025-02-03.
- See also: Quotes, Terminology, and Transcriptions.
"Political Saviours Are Not A Thing" could have also easily been titled, "Billionaires are not your cool friends".
It's all political theatre to keep the masses distracted in service of the corrupt matrix of rigged systems controlled by the evil ruling class. They will say the things we want to hear but their actions will be opposite. They claim to be ignorant and inept despite their endless resources of massive think tanks, secret agencies, unethical militaries, corrupt justice systems, exploitative corporations, and vile banksters. Reject the ruling class's Hanlon's Razor excuse. Only mafia governments reward for "gross ineptitude" and mass murder.
If you still have faith that Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Carney, and/or Pierre Poilievre intend to help humanity after reading, listening, or viewing the carefully curated content presented here, then as a willingly ignorant fool (brainwashed by the corporate media and/or infiltrated alternate media rotten with controlled-ops) you are a helpless waste of time and energy unless you learn to come around. Start by understanding the terminology.
Trusting a fun surface-dwelling questioner like news-reader Jimmy Dore can only take you so far. Deeper dives and better guides are necessary for greater contextual understanding. The recommended websites listicle includes some.
This article initially started by highlighting critically important sections within long-form Whitney Webb interviews. Read, listen, or view the great noted selections, and/or if able, be rewarded with many more powerful insights in her entire interviews.
To research specific people, institutions, or topical content, most if not all YouTube videos will provide auto-generated transcripts (found in the show notes), and you can CTRL-F to find key words (ie. Trump, Carney, Musk, etc.) or scroll through the entire A.I.-generated poorly formatted text.
Bill Gates
- More soon.
Donald Trump
It's not difficult to be better than the pathetic corrupt evil Joe Biden, but the lesser of two evils is painfully still very evil.
We shall see if he bothers to keep his promises, or, as per usual with second-term presidents, if he gets much worse with no more elections to campaign for and no one left to please but his ruling class friends.
Elon Musk
- continued...
George Soros
- More soon.
Joe Biden
Justin Trudeau
- More soon.
Mark Carney
- More soon.
Pierre Poilievre
- More soon.
Ruling Class
- More soon.
Zionism
- More soon.
_500x500.png)
