Difference between revisions of "WE Protect Freedom!/Committee and meeting management"

From Projex.Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<!-- "WORK IN PROGRESS" --> <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">{{Work in progress}}</div> : ''This page is a work in progress. F...")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
: ''This page is a work in progress.  Feel free to '''[[How to join Projex.Wiki|join]]''' to help edit Projex.Wiki.''
 
: ''This page is a work in progress.  Feel free to '''[[How to join Projex.Wiki|join]]''' to help edit Projex.Wiki.''
  
== Committee ==
 
 
: ''Pending consensus validation by community folks.''
 
  
 
{| style="border:0; padding:5px; margin:10px; float:right;"
 
{| style="border:0; padding:5px; margin:10px; float:right;"
Line 22: Line 19:
 
Guilt loves company more than misery.
 
Guilt loves company more than misery.
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
 +
== Committee ==
 +
 +
: ''Pending consensus validation by community folks.''
  
 
All human beings in our loosely formed open community are on equal footing.  Yet to be efficient and effective we must collectively arrive at decisions expediently - thus a reliable and trustworthy core management team should help.  Like it or not, a single "leader" is a single point of failure, whether it's absence, corruption, inability, self-interests, or whatever.  A small steering committee may self-manage their agendas, arrangements, schedules, etc. and inclusively communicate with subgroups (see [[#Subgroups]] below) and the larger community.  (Naturally folks remain free to create their own associations and private societies structured differently.)
 
All human beings in our loosely formed open community are on equal footing.  Yet to be efficient and effective we must collectively arrive at decisions expediently - thus a reliable and trustworthy core management team should help.  Like it or not, a single "leader" is a single point of failure, whether it's absence, corruption, inability, self-interests, or whatever.  A small steering committee may self-manage their agendas, arrangements, schedules, etc. and inclusively communicate with subgroups (see [[#Subgroups]] below) and the larger community.  (Naturally folks remain free to create their own associations and private societies structured differently.)
Line 141: Line 143:
 
* ''[http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/shortguide.pdf A Short Guide to Consensus Building.pdf]''
 
* ''[http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/shortguide.pdf A Short Guide to Consensus Building.pdf]''
 
* ''[[Robert's Rules of Order]]''
 
* ''[[Robert's Rules of Order]]''
 +
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Revision as of 12:44, 16 August 2023

Traffic cone construction orange white front.png WORK IN PROGRESS!
This page is under development.
Check back for developments.
Traffic cone construction orange white front.png
Feel free to join to help edit Projex.Wiki.
This page is a work in progress. Feel free to join to help edit Projex.Wiki.


Ray's Hierarchy Of Improvement.
Elegant
Efficient
Effective
Energetic
Enthusiastic


Necessity is the mother of invention, poverty is the mother of necessity.

Guilt loves company more than misery.


Committee

Pending consensus validation by community folks.

All human beings in our loosely formed open community are on equal footing. Yet to be efficient and effective we must collectively arrive at decisions expediently - thus a reliable and trustworthy core management team should help. Like it or not, a single "leader" is a single point of failure, whether it's absence, corruption, inability, self-interests, or whatever. A small steering committee may self-manage their agendas, arrangements, schedules, etc. and inclusively communicate with subgroups (see #Subgroups below) and the larger community. (Naturally folks remain free to create their own associations and private societies structured differently.)

Who

Establish a steering committee (core team, executive council, or whatever label) of at least five people.

  1. chair (may be a rotating position)
  2. vice chairs
  3. secretary
  4. treasurer

How

  • Anyone may call for a committee election at any meeting.
  • Anyone may nominate themselves or others at any meeting.
  • Committee members are free to skip meetings as they see fit when others can cover.
  • Committee members are responsible for distributing work and responsibilities with each other and the community to prevent overload, overwork, stress, etc.
  • Committee members are responsible for keeping each other and the community informed.
  • Committee members must be inclusive, openly transparent, and communicate clearly with the community, subgroups, other communities, and the public.
  • Committee members must never be closed off, elevated, nor Machiavellian.
  • Committee members should all be updated on everything equally and be able to fill in any position.
  • Committee members should number at least five.
  • No matter the number of committee members, all must be kept in the loop.
  • These criteria may evolve.
  • We may develop processes to retire committee members.

Duties

  • maintain and share agendas
  • maintain and share minutes
  • maintain order at the meetings
  • refine and share meeting rules/guidelines
  • run meetings

Potential duties

  • be as inclusive, open, and transparent as possible
  • calendar management
  • communications and networking with members, individuals, groups, and other communities
  • community organizing and management
  • community outreach
  • develop clear definitions and limits on issues with the community
    Examples:
    • organizing on this wiki page is a start
    • is recording of meetings or events permitted and under what conditions
    • what content is for personal/group/public/global consumption
  • event planning and execution
  • manage resources
  • oversee newsletters
  • oversee public relations (press releases, social media, websites, etc)
  • oversee subgroups
  • share all developments with the larger community


Meeting management

Pending consensus validation by community folks.

The goal: maintain order at the meetings.

Some of these ideas may be embraced, rejected, or linger on the fence, be rarely used, occasionally employed, or become mainstays - but all will require patience and practice to build up our collective better habits for more productive meetings.

To foster better respect and courtesy between folks its prudent that folks not interrupt speakers just as speakers should respect the community's limited time - thus we'd like to develop good habits with interruption and interjection mediation protocols.

Chair control

  • chair could signal with a call bell rather than a gavel
    1 bell = 5 minutes to meeting / end of presentation time / quiet, attention please!
    2 bells = 2 minutes to meeting / presentation 30 seconds over / interruption
    3 bells = 30 seconds to meeting / presentation 1 minute over
    4 bells = we're about to meeting / quiet, attention please!
  • talking stick?

Hand signals

  1. applause-hands (an element of participatory democracy used by the Occupy Movement )
  2. raised fingers
    • will wait for recognition from the chair
    • has something to say eventually (while not interrupting)
    • Make notes or potentially forget points while waiting!
    1 finger = one point to make
    2 fingers = two points to make
    3 fingers = three points to make
    • Lowered fingers indicate it's been covered or the moment has passed.
  3. urgent hands
    • Hands raised high outstretched above the head indicate urgency to express a short detail, correction, an interjection, etc. - while not yet interrupting.
  4. other ?

Ideally speaking

  • Ideally the person speaking should project their voice well.
    • Why bother speaking if you're not going to be heard?
    • Especially as some are hard of hearing.
  • Ideally the person speaking should stand.
  • Ideally with larger groups we'll have amplification gear for the speaker.
  • Ideally with much larger groups we'll have amplification gear for questions.

Notations

  1. pre-meeting: distribute PostIts + pens
  2. write down notes and questions rather than interrupt/interject
  3. post-meeting: collect PostIts + pens for future meetings

Quorum

A quorum is the minimal number of officers and members of a committee or organization, usually a majority, who must be present for valid transaction of business. The "requirement for a quorum is protection against totally unrepresentative action in the name of the body by an unduly small number of persons." In contrast, a plenum is a meeting of the full body. A body, or a meeting, or vote of it, is quorate if a quorum is present (or casts valid votes).

Currently this concept (and this wiki page) may be overkill. However, if our community grows we should be ready to employ fair management and protective safeguard tools like this.

The committee and/or community may develop the various criteria, classifications, and define the minimum number as well as the circumstances for a quorum.

Reference

For more ideas on efficient meeting discipline:


See also